IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v9y2024i3p372-395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

E-government, anticorruption, and citizens’ use of personal connections: evidence from Chinese municipalities

Author

Listed:
  • Ziteng Fan
  • Liang Ma

Abstract

Why do citizens prefer to utilize personal connections (e.g. guanxi) with government officials to access public services? Conventional wisdom suggests that improvements in formal institutions can reduce the popularity of informal behaviors; however, limited research has explored the relevant roles of e-government and anticorruption endeavors. Thus, based on survey data from 30 Chinese municipalities and multilevel regression designs, this study shows that citizens in cities with higher e-government development levels or who perceive governments’ anticorruption efforts to be effective are less likely to perform guanxi practices. The negative effect of e-government is also more salient among individuals with political connections. Therefore, this study contributes to the ongoing discussion on the relationship between formal institutions and guanxi practices by revealing the specific ways in which e-government development and anticorruption efforts lessen individuals’ reliance on guanxi.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziteng Fan & Liang Ma, 2024. "E-government, anticorruption, and citizens’ use of personal connections: evidence from Chinese municipalities," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 372-395, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:9:y:2024:i:3:p:372-395
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2024.2352912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2024.2352912
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2024.2352912?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:9:y:2024:i:3:p:372-395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.