IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v8y2023i2p283-301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pandemic control vs. economic recovery: understanding the dynamics of work and production resumption policy in local China

Author

Listed:
  • Biao Huang
  • Li Ye
  • Jiebing Wu

Abstract

How local governments respond to the COVID-19 pandemic has received much scholarly attention. The existing literature mainly focuses on epidemic prevention, while the contradictory policy goals of pandemic control and economic recovery are less investigated. How do local governments respond to such tasks with tension? This article approaches the question by analysing the policy divergence between central and local governments under the influence of the conflicting goals. Utilising an original dataset of policy divergence in work and production resumption policies between central and 244 municipal governments in China, this study finds that pandemic control is the priority of local governments, and the rationality-based logic rather than the capacity-based logic is followed by local leaders when formulating policy responses. The results extend the theoretical understanding of local governments’ policy response under pandemic conditions and provide a theoretical basis for better management of the pandemic in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Biao Huang & Li Ye & Jiebing Wu, 2023. "Pandemic control vs. economic recovery: understanding the dynamics of work and production resumption policy in local China," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 283-301, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:8:y:2023:i:2:p:283-301
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2022.2131977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2022.2131977
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2022.2131977?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:8:y:2023:i:2:p:283-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.