IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v1y2016i3p488-505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Justification of modern political order: on Fukuyama’s theory of Chinese governance

Author

Listed:
  • Jiantao Ren

Abstract

Fukuyama tried to expound political development in contemporary China and justify its universal effectiveness, with the interpretation mode of modern political order supported by the state, rule of law and accountability. It is appropriate to describe, analyze and conclude that current political development in China is under the circumstance of a powerful state, weak rule of law, and soft accountability. However, because of the absence of the premise of interpretation, it is doubted that Fukuyama’s interpretation mode of modern political order, which is supported by three pillars, is universally effective. It remains unsolved that the standard of defining modern state is much vaguer rather than clearer, the course of China’s development is more unpredictable rather than more explicit, and that the construction of modern political order is more evasive rather than more certain. In general, Fukuyama’s interpretation of modern political order is restrained within its positive approach. Therefore, his task of implementing normative interpretation in order to justify modern political order remains unaccomplished.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiantao Ren, 2016. "Justification of modern political order: on Fukuyama’s theory of Chinese governance," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(3), pages 488-505, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:1:y:2016:i:3:p:488-505
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2016.1212781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2016.1212781
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2016.1212781?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:1:y:2016:i:3:p:488-505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.