IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v1y2016i2p340-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global systemic risk ranking of Chinese financial institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Abdelkader Derbali

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the systemic risk of the Chinese financial institutions following the financial crisis of 2007. We estimate the systemic risk of a sample composed by 70 Chinese financial institutions through the period beginning on 02 January 2008 to 30 June 2015. We utilize the SRISK as a measure of systemic risk. This measure aims to capture financial institutions activity stress and its potential to become systemic. The proposed measures capture not only individual financial institutions vulnerability, but also the stress dependency structure between them and the Chinese financial system. In addition, these measures can be quite useful for identifying systematically important banks. Furthermore, the empirical results show that the level of systemic risk supported by the Chinese financial institutions is very elevated. The contribution of each institution in the risk of the financial system in the China is very important. The decomposition of systemic risk indicates that the institution has the higher level of debt, contributes positively and extremely to systemic risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdelkader Derbali, 2016. "Global systemic risk ranking of Chinese financial institutions," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 340-372, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:340-372
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2016.1165403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2016.1165403
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2016.1165403?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:340-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.