IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v1y2016i2p303-323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asymmetrical adaptations to grassroots self-government between rural and urban China

Author

Listed:
  • S. Philip Hsu

Abstract

This article explores how the party-state in China manages to cope with grassroots self-government (jiceng zizhi) in a changing social milieu. Specifically, the party-state resorts to simultaneous deployment of carrots and sticks, dubbed “dual adaptations” in this article, in coping with the leading organizations of grassroots self-government—villagers committee in the rural and residents committee in the urban areas. On the one hand, it attempts to maintain controls over them to prevent them from becoming alternative power centers, given their inherent potential for authoritative decision-making that could defy the party-state. On the other, it seeks to strengthen its own capacities to accommodate domestic changes, meet the mass demands, and shore up its legitimacy by fostering the mass political participation, competition, and problem-solving ability that offsets the state's inadequacies in governance via villagers and residents committees. The degrees to which the dual adaptations attain the party-state's intended goals, however, are asymmetrical in that they vary between rural and urban areas. This article thus discovers dual asymmetries in the adaptations—with one between rural and urban areas, and the other between the effectiveness in achieving the two goals, which helps enrich our understanding of the complexities in China's internal governance.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Philip Hsu, 2016. "Asymmetrical adaptations to grassroots self-government between rural and urban China," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 303-323, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:303-323
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2016.1172399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2016.1172399
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2016.1172399?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:303-323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.