IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v1y2016i1p174-187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The China model and its efficacy in a comparative context

Author

Listed:
  • Liang Tang

Abstract

This article takes economic modernization and political democratization as the end goals of national modernization, and it regards the configuration of political and economic institutions as the institutional framework for achieving those goals. The first section puts forward a brief analysis of the characteristics of the three main models, namely, the Western model, the socialist model and the authoritarian developmentalism, in order to lay a useful analytical foundation for subsequent discussion of the China model. The second section defines the China model as a kind of authoritarian developmentalism. It proceeds to analyze its characteristics or effectiveness by comparing with other authoritarian developmentalism. The third section looks at the challenges and prospects of the China model from the developmental perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang Tang, 2016. "The China model and its efficacy in a comparative context," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 174-187, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:174-187
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2016.1138705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2016.1138705
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2016.1138705?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:174-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.