IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v9y1997i3p313-333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Realism and a Christian Perspective on Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Clive Beed
  • Cara Beed

Abstract

Beed & Beed (1996a) argued that a Christian philosophy and methodology provide an alternative mode of thinking about economic matters than is provided by secular economics. The Christian view is shown here to be a form of realism, having affinity with the metaphysical realism propounded by Trigg (1989, 1993), but differing from the critical realism of Bhaskar (1989, 1994) and others, advocated by Lawson (1997) in economics. A brief history and outline of realism are presented so it is clear what is being compared with the Christian position. This is followed by comparison of Christian realism with metaphysical and critical realism. Some illustrations of how Christian realism might be applied to economic questions are developed to show how it differs from the way in which secular forms of realism might analyse the same questions. Applying Christian realism to socio-economic matters requires an interdependent and normative approach in the context of a given metaphysical worldview. It takes the analysis of economic questions into territory unfamiliar to secular economics and which the latter may well reject as not being economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Clive Beed & Cara Beed, 1997. "Realism and a Christian Perspective on Economics," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 313-333.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:9:y:1997:i:3:p:313-333
    DOI: 10.1080/751245298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/751245298
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/751245298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kincaid,Harold, 1996. "Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521482684, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marchionni, Caterina & Reijula, Samuli, 2018. "What is mechanistic evidence, and why do we need it for evidence-based policy?," SocArXiv 4ufbm, Center for Open Science.
    2. Clive Beed & Cara Beed, 1999. "Intellectual Progress and Academic Economics: Rational Choice and Game Theory," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 163-185, December.
    3. Raina, Rajeswari S., 2003. "Disciplines, institutions and organizations: impact assessments in context," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 185-211, November.
    4. Timothy M. Devinney & Jan Hohberger, 2017. "The past is prologue: Moving on from Culture’s Consequences," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(1), pages 48-62, January.
    5. Łukasz Hard, 2014. "Models of Mechanisms and their Role in Building Economic Explanations," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 37.
    6. Donald W. Katzner, 2015. "A Neoclassical Curmudgeon Looks at Heterodox Criticisms of Microeconomics," World Economic Review, World Economics Association, vol. 2015(4), pages 1-63, February.
    7. Tomas Hellström, 2008. "Transferability and Naturalistic Generalization: New Generalizability Concepts for Social Science or Old Wine in New Bottles?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 321-337, June.
    8. David Kihangire, 2005. "The Effects Of Exchange Rate Variability On Exports: Evidence From Uganda (1988 – 2001)," International Trade 0505013, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Marc Orlitzky, 2011. "Institutionalized dualism: statistical significance testing as myth and ceremony," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 47-77, September.
    10. Steven Rappaport, 1996. "Abstraction and unrealistic assumptions in economics," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 215-236.
    11. Alejandro Portes, 2008. "Migration and Social Change: Some Conceptual Reflections," Working Papers 1096, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Migration and Development..
    12. Reinhard Neck, 2021. "Methodological Individualism: Still a Useful Methodology for the Social Sciences?," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 49(4), pages 349-361, December.
    13. Malcolm Williams & Luke Sloan & Charlotte Brookfield, 2017. "A Tale of Two Sociologies: Analyzing Versus Critique in UK Sociology," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(4), pages 132-151, December.
    14. Jesus Felipe & John S.L. McCombie, 2013. "The Aggregate Production Function and the Measurement of Technical Change," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1975.
    15. Khan, Amna & Lindridge, Andrew & Pusaksrikit, Theeranuch, 2018. "Why some South Asian Muslims celebrate Christmas: Introducing ‘acculturation trade-offs’," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 290-299.
    16. Rick Szostak, 2008. "Classifying Heterodoxy," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 97-126, March.
    17. Matthew Longshore Smith & Carolina Seward, 2009. "The Relational Ontology of Amartya Sen's Capability Approach: Incorporating Social and Individual Causes," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 213-235.
    18. Pavlína Hejduková & Lucie Kureková, 2016. "Causality As A Tool For Empirical Analysis In Economics," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 4407035, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    19. Lex Donaldson, 2008. "Ethics Problems and Problems with Ethics: Toward a Pro-Management Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 299-311, March.
    20. repec:pri:cmgdev:wp0804 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Ramzi Mabsout, 2014. "Bringing Ethics Back to Welfare Economics," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(1), pages 1-27, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:9:y:1997:i:3:p:313-333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.