IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v36y2024i5p2068-2084.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Was the September 2019 US Money Market Turmoil Due to Insufficient ‘Loanable Funds’?

Author

Listed:
  • Domenica Tropeano

Abstract

This paper deals with the September 2019 money market turmoil in the United States. It criticizes the thesis that the rates rise was due to the lack of intervention by the four largest banks that did not have enough reserves to be lent to dealers. This thesis is based on the loanable funds theory. A thesis consistent with the theory of monetary base endogeneity is presented in which the lack of intervention by the four largest banks is motivated by the uncertainty on whether reserves would be needed to settle trades within the day, the unwillingness to borrow overnight from the Fed and the uncertainty on the evolution of money market rates at which the loans might have had to be refinanced. While regulation changes may have mattered in imposing liquidity constraints to major lenders these regulation changes were intentionally aimed at discouraging excessive borrowing and lending. The intervention by the central bank in restoring normal conditions however validates a structure of prices of financial assets that contributes to inequality and a flow of financing to investment funds whose strategies do not foster the capital development of the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Domenica Tropeano, 2024. "Was the September 2019 US Money Market Turmoil Due to Insufficient ‘Loanable Funds’?," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 2068-2084, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:36:y:2024:i:5:p:2068-2084
    DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2024.2423228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09538259.2024.2423228
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09538259.2024.2423228?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:36:y:2024:i:5:p:2068-2084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.