IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v36y2024i5p1964-1981.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

There is no Room: The Role of Net Reciprocal Effectual Demands in Ricardo’s Theory of Foreign Trade

Author

Listed:
  • Gustavo Bhering
  • Franklin Serrano

Abstract

The paper aims to contribute to the Sraffian interpretation of Ricardo’s theory of foreign trade in his Principles, following the recent reappraisal of Sraffa’s 1930 paper. We argue that Ricardo assumed that trade happened at natural relative prices in each country, and that those prices are determined by taking as given the real wage, the available methods of production and the set of sectoral effectual demands. We show that gravitation towards natural prices ensures that: (i) Ricardo’s theory is not incomplete, so there is no need for price elastic demand functions, contrary to what John Stuart Mill argued; (ii) the quantities imported of a particular commodity will correspond to the domestic effectual demand for that commodity, net of what is produced locally by lands of superior quality, which we call ‘net effectual demands’; (iii) the terms of trade are fully determined by the ratio of the total (absolute) quantity of labor embodied in the imported commodities relative to the total quantity of labor contained in the exported commodity; and (iv) in the simple examples in chapter 7, gravitation also implies that the terms of trade are determined directly by the ratio of the given levels of reciprocal net effectual demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Gustavo Bhering & Franklin Serrano, 2024. "There is no Room: The Role of Net Reciprocal Effectual Demands in Ricardo’s Theory of Foreign Trade," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 1964-1981, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:36:y:2024:i:5:p:1964-1981
    DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2022.2134686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09538259.2022.2134686
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09538259.2022.2134686?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:36:y:2024:i:5:p:1964-1981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.