Author
Listed:
- Iris Buder
- David Fields
- Gwyneth Donahue
- Maria Ramirez
Abstract
A number of researchers in various fields of study have made important contributions regarding labor market disparities. While the notion of occupational prestige is mentioned, it, generally speaking, has been understudied and underused when studying disparities and inequities in the U.S. As social comparisons of distinct categories of social standing can illuminate the degree to which there are social gradients, we analyze occupational prestige disparities by race/ethnicity and gender, and the intersection thereof, after controlling for relevant sociodemographic factors. This analysis focuses on the differentials between industry classifications and also within specified occupational groupings. Such social standing differentials by gender and race/ethnicity are important to address as they influence social mobility and social positioning. Hence, such differentials have wide ranging implications regarding the distribution of social resources and life chances, which can translate into nested sets of social inclusion and exclusion. We seek to further illuminate economic and social disparities in the labor market by noting that, such differentials are not explanatory on the basis of personal responsibility or cultural practices, unlike the stance usually taken by public policy discourse. We argue that a more holistic approach is needed when analyzing gender and racial/ethnic disparities in labor market outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Iris Buder & David Fields & Gwyneth Donahue & Maria Ramirez, 2024.
"Stratification Economics and Occupational Prestige: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach,"
Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 1678-1697, October.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:36:y:2024:i:4:p:1678-1697
DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2022.2142464
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:36:y:2024:i:4:p:1678-1697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.