IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v36y2024i3p1253-1278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Road Less Travelled: Keynes and Knight on Probability and Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Bill Gerrard

Abstract

Knight’s risk/uncertainty distinction is reviewed in its original context as a contribution to the theory of profit. Knight’s approach to probability is paralleled by Ludwig von Mises, as emphasised by recent developments in strategic entrepreneurship theory. Von Mises distinguishes between class probability (i.e., risk) and case probability (i.e., uncertainty) in contrast to the frequentist approach of his brother, Richard von Mises. Keynes’s contribution to probability and uncertainty is reviewed, focusing on his logical theory of probability in A Treatise on Probability which he more fully contextualised subsequently in the General Theory. Keynes’s fragmentary later philosophical writings are reviewed to provide some insight into the contextual issues encountered. The key contributions of Knight and Keynes are summarised as signposts for ‘The Road Less Travelled’. The possibilities of a Keynesian-Knightian synthesis as a way forward are considered by comparing these signposts. However, it is concluded that, although there is some common ground between Knight and Keynes, there are fundamental differences particularly associated with the definition of confidence that preclude any meaningful synthesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Bill Gerrard, 2024. "The Road Less Travelled: Keynes and Knight on Probability and Uncertainty," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 1253-1278, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:36:y:2024:i:3:p:1253-1278
    DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2022.2114291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09538259.2022.2114291
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09538259.2022.2114291?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:36:y:2024:i:3:p:1253-1278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.