IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v34y2022i1p165-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Price-Value Deviations and the Labour Theory of Value: Evidence from 42 Countries, 2000–2017

Author

Listed:
  • Güney Işıkara
  • Patrick Mokre

Abstract

The relationship between prices and labour values has been the source of fruitful controversy since the earliest Classical Political Economists. The alleged refutation of the labour theory of value was an integral part of the marginalist attack against Classical and Marxist analysis. However, statistical analysis of price-value relationships made possible by the data available since the later 20th century suggest considerable empirical strength of the labour theory of value. We trace the intellectual history of the price-value relationship and its inseparable link to capitalist competition through Smith, Ricardo, Marx and Sraffa. Following Shaikh and Ochoa, we present an empirical model of testing their hypotheses that (1) labour values regulate prices of production and (2) serve as gravitational centres for market prices. The analysis of a large dataset of 42 countries and 15 years reveal only small and stable deviations and thus lend support to the Classical Political Economic analysis. With a sample of over 36,000 price vectors, we provide the most comprehensive empirical application of its class and generalize the results that have been established in the relevant literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Güney Işıkara & Patrick Mokre, 2022. "Price-Value Deviations and the Labour Theory of Value: Evidence from 42 Countries, 2000–2017," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 165-180, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:34:y:2022:i:1:p:165-180
    DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2021.1904648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09538259.2021.1904648
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09538259.2021.1904648?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rotta, Tomás N. & Kumar, Rishabh, 2024. "Was Marx right? Development and exploitation in 43 countries, 2000–2014," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 213-223.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:34:y:2022:i:1:p:165-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.