IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v32y2020i1p49-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kaldor 3.0: An Empirical Investigation of the Verdoorn-augmented Technical Progress Function

Author

Listed:
  • Fabrizio Antenucci
  • Matteo Deleidi
  • Walter Paternesi Meloni

Abstract

Consistent with neoclassical theory, the recent slowdown in labour productivity is generally regarded as one of the main causes of the current phase of economic stagnation. By contrast, post-Keynesian economics looks at productivity growth as positively affected by the rate of growth of output in the long run as well. By focusing on this alternative perspective, in our exploration we deal with an extended version of the Kaldorian technical progress function in which the trend growth rate of productivity is endogenously shaped by the dynamics of both output and capital−labour ratio. We empirically verify such a relationship for the total economy and the manufacturing sector through a structural vector autoregressive (SVAR) model for G7 countries (1970–2017). Our findings support the validity of a technical progress function, which admits increasing returns to scale, thus indicating that both the rate of growth of output and the process of capital intensification exert positive effects on productivity growth, even beyond the business cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabrizio Antenucci & Matteo Deleidi & Walter Paternesi Meloni, 2020. "Kaldor 3.0: An Empirical Investigation of the Verdoorn-augmented Technical Progress Function," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 49-76, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:32:y:2020:i:1:p:49-76
    DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2020.1744936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09538259.2020.1744936
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09538259.2020.1744936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandre Gomes, 2020. "Regional economic growth in China from a Kaldorian perspective: A comparative study of Nanjing and Suzhou," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 73(295), pages 283-312.
    2. Nishi, Hiroshi, 2022. "Income distribution, technical change, and economic growth: A two-sector Kalecki–Kaldor approach," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 418-432.
    3. Stefano Di Bucchianico, 2021. "Negative Interest Rate Policy to Fight Secular Stagnation: Unfeasible, Ineffective, Irrelevant, or Inadequate?," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 687-710, October.
    4. Stefano Lucarelli & Gaetano Perone, 2020. "Quando la produttivitˆ limitata dalla bilancia dei pagamenti. Una riflessione sulle relazioni fra centro e periferia nellÕunione monetaria europea a partire dallÕequazione della produttivitˆ di Sylos ," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 73(292), pages 325-353.
    5. Fontanari, Claudia, 2024. "The role of wages in triggering innovation and productivity: A dynamic exploration for European economies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    6. Stirati, Antonella & Paternesi Meloni, Walter, 2021. "Unemployment and the wage share: a long-run exploration for major mature economies," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 330-352.
    7. Borsato, Andrea & Lorentz, André, 2023. "The Kaldor–Verdoorn law at the age of robots and AI," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(10).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:32:y:2020:i:1:p:49-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.