IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revape/v35y2008i116p185-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

South Africa: Revisiting Capital's ‘Formative Action’

Author

Listed:
  • Carolyn Bassett

Abstract

This article revisits Saul and Gelb's 1981 analysis of South African capital's ‘formative action’, employing their framework to assess how capital hasshaped the economic framework since 1990. I show that once prominentbusiness leaders became committed to non‐racial democracy, the privatesector became enormously influential in shaping the economic programme.The policy changes permitted South African firms to restructure theiroperations largely on their own terms, becoming major investors elsewherein Africa and around the world. Despite their ostensible success, the neoliberal framework they cultivated may lack durability, simply because the ‘historical bloc’ underpinning it is so narrow that the programme has notoffered many benefits to the majority. Despite measures taken by thegovernment since 2000 to broaden the political coalition supporting the neoliberal restructuring, the recent crisis over presidential succession reflects the failure to vest the economic changes in a hegemonic programme.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolyn Bassett, 2008. "South Africa: Revisiting Capital's ‘Formative Action’," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(116), pages 185-202, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:revape:v:35:y:2008:i:116:p:185-202
    DOI: 10.1080/03056240802193804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03056240802193804
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03056240802193804?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nick Bernards, 2018. "The Truncated Commercialization of Microinsurance and the Limits of Neoliberalism," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(6), pages 1447-1470, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revape:v:35:y:2008:i:116:p:185-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CREA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.