IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/reroxx/v34y2021i1p2115-2134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The hybrid intellectual capital valuation method

Author

Listed:
  • Ratapol Wudhikarn

Abstract

This study aims to improve the existing problems of intellectual capital (IC) measurement methods including those with unclear and unspecific calculation details and the inability to valuate the influences between IC measures and between IC components, which is a fundamental characteristic of IC. To address the fundamental issues of past methods, this study integrates two multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods: the analytic network process (ANP) and the simple additive weighting (SAW) method, both of which provide specific and clear calculation procedures. ANP is adopted to manage the valuation of influences between IC elements, while SAW is used to solve incommensurable units of IC performance indicators and different concentrations on IC measures and components. Implementation of the method revealed a clear and systematic measurement procedure. The proposed method could consider the relationships among IC measures as well as among IC components and presented calculated results in the form of the weights of IC measurement compositions. Furthermore, the method maintained the crucial characteristics of IC measurement: the ability to standardise units of measure and the capability to valuate the performance of IC for the appropriate measure, component, and holism level.

Suggested Citation

  • Ratapol Wudhikarn, 2021. "The hybrid intellectual capital valuation method," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 2115-2134, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:34:y:2021:i:1:p:2115-2134
    DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2020.1860798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1860798
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1860798?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:34:y:2021:i:1:p:2115-2134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rero .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.