IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/reroxx/v32y2019i1p2122-2137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability, market conditions and outreach: the vicious misconception of the win-win proposition in the microfinance industry

Author

Listed:
  • Ikram Ullah
  • Muhammad Idrees Khawaja
  • Nasir Iqbal

Abstract

The shift of the Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) from the poverty-lending approach to the financial system approach is likely to have two counterbalancing effects on the social mission of poverty alleviation and women empowerment. On the one hand – and as is desirable – financial sustainability could cause MFIs to increase the depth and breadth of their outreach. But on the other hand – and possibly at the cost of the social mission – financial sustainability may become the core objective of the MFIs. The aim of this paper is to investigate which of the two outcomes is most likely in MFIs following the financial system approach. For this purpose, the paper first develops a theoretical framework to deduce testable hypotheses. The hypotheses are then tested with data from 158 rated MFIs, using various panel data estimation techniques. Results obtained thus reveal that majority of the MFIs in developing countries hold some market power. Besides, we find that financial sustainability is at odds with the social mission of alleviating poverty and empowering women and does not translate into depth and breadth of outreach. The study also discusses some policy implications of the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Ikram Ullah & Muhammad Idrees Khawaja & Nasir Iqbal, 2019. "Sustainability, market conditions and outreach: the vicious misconception of the win-win proposition in the microfinance industry," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 2122-2137, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:32:y:2019:i:1:p:2122-2137
    DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2019.1642779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1642779
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1642779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:32:y:2019:i:1:p:2122-2137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rero .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.