IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/reroxx/v32y2019i1p1869-1882.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are the current methods for the distribution of public funds in secondary education effective? Multiple criteria model in the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Petra Maresova
  • Kamil Kuca

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to analyse the current financing system for schools in the Czech Republic and the subsequent formulation of criteria for improving the redistribution of funds from public sources. First, the method of retrospective analysis of expenditures on education financing at European level and the developed countries of the OECD. Second, the multiple criteria model for the distribution of funds is established using Expert Choice. Finally, a method of guided interviews will be exploited in order to detect attitudes, priorities of representatives from the education department and the economic department in the Czech Republic. In the analysis of secondary school finance decision-making, individual solution options and key criteria were specified. The criteria include justice, motivation, stability, controllability and simplicity. Based on the multi-criteria evaluation output, it is possible to recommend the inclusion of three elements in the current financing system of secondary education in the Czech Republic. These are the tracking of graduates in the labour market, assessment of schools and teachers.

Suggested Citation

  • Petra Maresova & Kamil Kuca, 2019. "Are the current methods for the distribution of public funds in secondary education effective? Multiple criteria model in the Czech Republic," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 1869-1882, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:32:y:2019:i:1:p:1869-1882
    DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2019.1640622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1640622
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1640622?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:32:y:2019:i:1:p:1869-1882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rero .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.