IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/reroxx/v26y2013i4p59-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Small Organizations Have an Effort to Survive? Survey from Small Czech Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Marie Mikušová

Abstract

This paper presents some results of research carried out in 2011. The research was focused on the relationship of small organizations to crisis prevention. The purpose is to find out the attitude of small organizations to crises from strategic point of view in order to ensure not only their survival but also their competiveness. The goal is to identify what strategies, if any, small organizations use for crises prevention.The factor analysis identified two crisis prevention strategies. One strategy is focused on creating and updating a crisis plan and crisis team. The other is based on appropriate behaviour to employees and surroundings so that the organization builds up their loyalty. Preparation for crises is mostly complicated by the financing gap which could be expected in small organizations and managers also declared they were too busy to deal with crisis prevention. Based on the statistically processed data obtained from empirical research the author came to the conclusion that, although many small organizations know their weaknesses and external threats and try to take precautionary measures, the preparation for a potential crisis has still not become a normal part of managerial work and it is not appreciated as a feature of competitiveness. Statistical tools of correlation analysis and factor analysis were used in the research.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie Mikušová, 2013. "Do Small Organizations Have an Effort to Survive? Survey from Small Czech Organizations," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 59-76, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:26:y:2013:i:4:p:59-76
    DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2013.11517630
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1331677X.2013.11517630
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1331677X.2013.11517630?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:26:y:2013:i:4:p:59-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rero .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.