IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/reroxx/v26y2013i3p31-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptive Markets Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence from Montenegro Equity Market

Author

Listed:
  • Saša Popović
  • Ana Mugoša
  • Andrija Đurović

Abstract

In this paper we examined adaptive markets hypothesis (AMH) using three factors we assumed that affect weak-form of market efficiency: observation period, time horizon represented by rolling window sizes and data aggregation level. We have analyzed market value weighted index MONEX20, which is proxy from Montenegro equity market, over 2004-2011 period. Rolling window analysis with fixed parameter in each window is employed to measure the persistence of deviations from a random walk hypothesis (RWH) over time. Actually, using rolling sample approach we checked whether short-range linear dependence is varying over time. This method was applied on the first order serial autocorrelation coefficients (AC1), as well as on runs test, since evidence on non-normality properties of MONEX20 suggests using non-parametric test. The evidence was found that all three factors impact degree of weak-form Montenegro equity market efficiency which has serious consequences on profit opportunities over time on this market.

Suggested Citation

  • Saša Popović & Ana Mugoša & Andrija Đurović, 2013. "Adaptive Markets Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence from Montenegro Equity Market," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 31-46, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:26:y:2013:i:3:p:31-46
    DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2013.11517620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1331677X.2013.11517620
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1331677X.2013.11517620?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:26:y:2013:i:3:p:31-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rero .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.