IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repmxx/v6y2000i2p101-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Asymmetric REIT-Beta Puzzle

Author

Listed:
  • Arjun Chatrath
  • Youguo Liang
  • Willard McIntosh

Abstract

Executive Summary. Recent investigations into the behavior of real estate investment trusts (REITs) point to an asymmetric relationship between the returns of REITs and those of the general market. Specifically, REIT returns more closely track the general market when markets are declining than when they are rising. In this article, we provide further evidence on the nature of this ‘return-dependence’ in REIT betas and investigate its origins. We advance and test three explanations for this pattern, namely (1) the decay in the REITs-stock market relationship; (2) dividend-related effects; and (3) small-stock effects. The evidence suggests that the asymmetry in beta is not the product of dividend effects or a declining REIT-market relationship. Instead, the pattern in REIT betas is similar to small capitalization stocks in general. However, the traditional explanations for the small stock effect in betas are not found to satisfactorily describe the beta pattern in REITs. Notably, the asymmetry in betas, particularly in small stocks, has been thought to arise from returns being related to their variances. We find that the asymmetry in REITs' betas persist even when we control for such variance effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Arjun Chatrath & Youguo Liang & Willard McIntosh, 2000. "The Asymmetric REIT-Beta Puzzle," Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 101-111, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:6:y:2000:i:2:p:101-111
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2000.12089599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2000.12089599
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2000.12089599?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:6:y:2000:i:2:p:101-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/repm20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.