IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repmxx/v2y1996i1p19-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Real Estate Portfolio Diversification and Performance of the Twenty Largest MSAs

Author

Listed:
  • John Williams

Abstract

Executive Summary. This study evaluates the relative portfolio performance of the twenty largest MSAs by population through the application of modern portfolio theory (MPT) to economic base analysis. Each MSA is treated as a single portfolio comprised of the local industries and government services. Using employment and wage data covering the latest complete business cycle (peak July 81 to July 90 peak), portfolio risk, portfolio return and a relative risk estimate (“metro beta”) were calculated for each MSA. Covariances of employment changes between industries and governmental sectors were computed to determine the “portfolio risk”. Correlations of changes in aggregate employment between the MSAs were also computed in order to examine geographical diversification. In addition, the mean-variance efficiency of several naive portfolios was examined and the portfolios ranked.Findings from this study indicate that economic base diversification by industry and government services at the MSA level yield diversification benefits for portfolios. Moreover, geographical diversification, based on correlations between MSAs, yields portfolio benefits that are superior to the naive approaches that were tested. This study provides institutional real estate investors with an another technique for improving the performance of their real estate portfolios.

Suggested Citation

  • John Williams, 1996. "Real Estate Portfolio Diversification and Performance of the Twenty Largest MSAs," Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 19-30, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:2:y:1996:i:1:p:19-30
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.1996.12089520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.1996.12089520
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.1996.12089520?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:2:y:1996:i:1:p:19-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/repm20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.