IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repmxx/v28y2022i1p78-107.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

Unstable Unsmoothing—An Evaluation of Correction Procedures for Appraisal-Based Real Estate Indices

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas M. Gohs
  • Pascal Frömel
  • Steffen Sebastian

Abstract

This study examines various methods for correcting the smoothness of appraisal-based indices proposed by real estate research. Such methods are widely applied in asset allocation decisions when transaction-based indices are not available. Using more than 40 years of index data, we investigate the distributional features of the obtained “unsmoothed” return series on both a quarterly and an annual basis. Repeated evaluations with evolving time windows reveal a remarkable lack of distributional stability for the majority of techniques. We also propose and test modified procedures for several models. Our results suggest a need for caution when applying appraisal-based real estate indices in an asset allocation context, as well as for interpreting the empirical results from unsmoothed data. The results suggest that less sophisticated correction techniques may provide equivalent solutions to address the smoothness of appraisal-based returns.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas M. Gohs & Pascal Frömel & Steffen Sebastian, 2022. "Unstable Unsmoothing—An Evaluation of Correction Procedures for Appraisal-Based Real Estate Indices," Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 78-107, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:28:y:2022:i:1:p:78-107
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2022.2069654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2022.2069654
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2022.2069654?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:28:y:2022:i:1:p:78-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/repm20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.