IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repmxx/v28y2022i1p33-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Risk of Novel Specialized REITs

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaorui Piao
  • Wenjing Yao
  • Bin Mei

Abstract

Under the multivariate GARCH framework, we examined the risk characteristics of six groups of novel specialized REITs in the United States, which had experienced significant changes from 2004 to 2019. The six groups are healthcare, hotel, self-storage, mortgaged-backed security (MBS), high-tech, and timber REITs. Results show that the six specialized REIT groups displayed different patterns of volatility surrounding the 2007–2009 financial crisis. The volatilities and dynamic conditional correlations (DCC) reached their peaks during the financial crisis and recovered two years afterwards. Mostly positive DCCs imply that the diversification effect was weak among the specialized REIT groups. Specialized REITs exhibited lower risks than the overall market. Among the three subsample (pre-crisis, crisis, and post-crisis) periods and across all specialized REIT groups, conditional variance was the smallest and excess kurtosis was the largest over the pre-crisis period; constant variance was the largest during the crisis; and skewness was the largest and correlations were the most volatile after the crisis. For individual REIT groups, healthcare and hotel REITs had the smallest and largest excess kurtosis; MBS and hotel REITs had the smallest and largest systematic and total risks; and self-storage and MBS REITs had the weakest and strongest leverage effect, respectively. In addition, high-tech REITs had the largest mean returns as well as increasing time-varying correlations with other groups before the crisis, and healthcare and high-tech REITs had more skewed returns than MBS and timber REITs.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaorui Piao & Wenjing Yao & Bin Mei, 2022. "On the Risk of Novel Specialized REITs," Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 33-47, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:28:y:2022:i:1:p:33-47
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2021.2008095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2021.2008095
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2021.2008095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:28:y:2022:i:1:p:33-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/repm20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.