IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repmxx/v25y2020i2p172-193.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evolution of Equity REITs Betas: Analysis from 1997 to 2014

Author

Listed:
  • Cuono Massimo Coletta
  • Francesco Busato

Abstract

The paper analyzes how the betas of real estate investment trusts (REITs) evolved over the period January 1997 to December 2014 using a hybrid beta model, which shrinks rolling window estimates toward firm-specifics based on prior economic theory. Then, we compare the hybrid beta estimates to those obtained with the most common models used in practice, the CAPM and the Three-Factor model developed by Fama and French, to determine which is the most reliable tool to estimate risk factors for REITs as a particular type of industry. The results indicate that the hybrid beta model is superior to the the CAPM and Three-Factor models in estimating betas for the research sample of Equity REITs we observed over the considered period. This conclusion is based on a non-parametric test comparing the R2 from the regressions of each model. Moreover, the annual evolution of the risk loadings obtained using the hybrid beta model seems to be more reasonable given both the specific characteristics of REITs and the impact of the world financial crises that occurred in 2008.

Suggested Citation

  • Cuono Massimo Coletta & Francesco Busato, 2020. "The Evolution of Equity REITs Betas: Analysis from 1997 to 2014," Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 172-193, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:25:y:2020:i:2:p:172-193
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2020.1803701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2020.1803701
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2020.1803701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:25:y:2020:i:2:p:172-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/repm20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.