IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repmxx/v25y2019i1p77-98.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

A Market-Driven Green Office Building Index

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Simons
  • Spenser Robinson
  • Eunkyu Lee

Abstract

Executive Summary. This paper reports on the development and potential implementation of a new green office building rating index intended for building owners and real estate office portfolio managers. It provides a market-driven green scoring method applicable to most U.S. office buildings. The underlying index data draws from office tenant surveys and hedonic analysis of rent rolls. This paper details the development and first steps towards implementation of the scoring system. A variety of models are analyzed, discussed, optimized, and tested on a captive sample of 197 U.S. office buildings. A reasonable model shows that about 40% of the non-LEED-certified buildings score higher than the lowest scoring LEED-certified building. This indicates a market may be present for this type of measurement tool. Office and portfolio managers could use this index to market the sustainability features in their buildings and obtain a market premium for these features.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Simons & Spenser Robinson & Eunkyu Lee, 2019. "A Market-Driven Green Office Building Index," Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 77-98, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:25:y:2019:i:1:p:77-98
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2019.12090025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2019.12090025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2019.12090025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:25:y:2019:i:1:p:77-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/repm20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.