IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repmxx/v23y2017i1p1-5.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

Mind the Gap in REITs

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Lee

Abstract

Executive Summary. Portfolio diversification is a fundamental tenet of modern portfolio theory. Statman and Scheid (2008), however, argue that while correlation is the common indicator of diversification, correlation coefficients alone do not provide an intuitive indicator of diversification benefits. The authors demonstrate that portfolio diversification also depends on the standard deviation of asset returns and introduce the idea of return gap. Return gap is basically a gap between the returns of two assets. Statman and Scheid (2008) conclude that “the relative ranks of assets by benefits of diversification are quite different when measured by correlation and by return gap.” I investigate this claim in the U.S. real estate investment trust (REIT) industry using monthly data from January 1994 to December 2014. I find that, while correlation coefficients suggest little diversification benefits within the REIT sector, return gaps indicate that there still is scope for diversification across REITs, even during down markets and periods of financial crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Lee, 2017. "Mind the Gap in REITs," Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 1-5, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:23:y:2017:i:1:p:1-5
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2017.12089994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2017.12089994
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2017.12089994?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:23:y:2017:i:1:p:1-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/repm20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.