IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repmxx/v20y2014i1p79-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Point of View: Office Property Performance in Live-Work-Play Places

Author

Listed:
  • Emil Malizia

Abstract

This analysis of central business districts (CBDs) and their suburban areas was inspired by the analysis of 24-hour cities by Kelly, Adair, McGreal, and Roulac (2013). The 44 cities are drawn from the 50 largest U.S. metro areas and include 24 of the 26 markets in the Kelly, Adair, McGreal, and Roulac article. Downtowns like the seven 24-hour cities offer live-workplay (LWP) environments that appear to be attracting young talent and tech-oriented companies. LWP places are compact, dense, connected, mixed use, diverse, and walkable with destinations, public spaces, and critical mass. Research conducted for NAIOP defined places with these features as ‘‘vibrant centers.’’ Subsequent work produced an index with nine face-valid measures of vibrancy for 65 cities. This analysis determines the extent to which the vibrancy index values are associated with the area-specific performance of office properties in these 44 large markets. The results indicate that strong associations do exist between downtown vibrancy and office property performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Emil Malizia, 2014. "Point of View: Office Property Performance in Live-Work-Play Places," Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 79-84, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:20:y:2014:i:1:p:79-84
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2014.12089964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2014.12089964
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2014.12089964?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:20:y:2014:i:1:p:79-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/repm20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.