IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repmxx/v18y2012i1p99-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavioral Finance and its Implication in the use of the Black-Litterman Model

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotta Mankert
  • Michael Seiler

Abstract

This article discusses the behavioral implications of the Black-Litterman model. In behavioral finance, the utility function of the investor is reference-based, and investors estimate losses and gains in relation to this benchmark. Implications drawn from past research within the field indicate and explain why the portfolio output given by the Black-Litterman model appears more intuitive to fund managers than portfolios generated by the Markowitz model. Another feature of the Black-Litterman model is that the user assigns levels of confidence associated with each asset view in the form of confidence intervals. People are overconfident in financial decision-making, particularly when stating confidence intervals, which is particularly problematic for this model. Hence implications from research regarding overconfidence do not favor the use of confidence levels when weighting portfolios.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotta Mankert & Michael Seiler, 2012. "Behavioral Finance and its Implication in the use of the Black-Litterman Model," Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 99-121, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:18:y:2012:i:1:p:99-121
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2012.12089911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2012.12089911
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2012.12089911?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:18:y:2012:i:1:p:99-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/repm20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.