IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repmxx/v16y2010i2p153-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investor Recognition and Expected Returns of EREITs

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Sun
  • Kenneth Yung
  • Hamid Rahman

Abstract

Executive Summary. The Merton (1987) model suggests that investors demand a higher return when required to trade on the basis of incomplete information. This research tests if the prediction of the Merton model can be validated for EREITs. The results are broadly consistent with the predictions of the Merton model. Returns increase monotonically with shadow cost. However, an analysis of portfolios sorted by shadow cost and size evidences some nonlinearity in the return-shadow cost relationship. The Fama-Macbeth regression analysis illustrates that shadow cost of incomplete information is a priced factor in the REIT return-generating process even in the presence of other control variables. The shadow cost is shown to be time varying, becoming increasingly significant as a return-generating factor in the post 1991 period of REIT industry ownership and control restructuring. Finally, the simulation of zero-cost trading strategies shows that a long position in high shadow cost REITs and a short position in low shadow cost REITs results in positive net benefits on the average.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Sun & Kenneth Yung & Hamid Rahman, 2010. "Investor Recognition and Expected Returns of EREITs," Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 153-169, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:16:y:2010:i:2:p:153-169
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2010.12089869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2010.12089869
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2010.12089869?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:16:y:2010:i:2:p:153-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/repm20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.