IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repmxx/v13y2007i3p191-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the Composition of the Market Portfolio Matter for Performance Rankings of Post-1986 Equity REITs?

Author

Listed:
  • Justin Benefield
  • Randy Anderson
  • Leonard Zumpano

Abstract

Executive Summary.Real estate investment trust (REIT) research indicates that performance rankings do not differ between market proxies containing real estate and the Standard and Poor’s 500, while mutual fund research shows that the proxy chosen significantly impacts performance rankings. Previous REIT performance ranking studies used rather obscure market indices, and only included time periods prior to the Tax Reform Act of 1986. Common market proxies are used to address whether the proxy chosen matters in REIT performance studies. Performance rankings utilize standard singlefactor methodologies and, where possible, their multifactor equivalents. Across all comparisons, results indicate that performance rankings of post-1986 equity REITs are insensitive to the market proxy chosen.

Suggested Citation

  • Justin Benefield & Randy Anderson & Leonard Zumpano, 2007. "Does the Composition of the Market Portfolio Matter for Performance Rankings of Post-1986 Equity REITs?," Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 191-204, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:13:y:2007:i:3:p:191-204
    DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2007.12089781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10835547.2007.12089781
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10835547.2007.12089781?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repmxx:v:13:y:2007:i:3:p:191-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/repm20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.