IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v36y2002i4p421-428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Development Role of English RDAs: The Need for Greater Discretionary Power

Author

Listed:
  • C. Fuller
  • R. J. Bennett
  • M. Ramsden

Abstract

In the late 1990s Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) were introduced into the English economic development policy and partnership landscape. Cited as a way in which to improve regional competitiveness and innovation, their task is to build institutional capacity by creating a strategic context for sub-regional organizations and fostering partnerships. This article examines developing inter-institutional relations between RDAs, sub-regional organizations and central government departments in the field of learning and skills, business support and inward investment. It suggests that a lack of discretionary power and resources has undermined RDA ability to pursue their strategic aims and influence other organizations. In response, RDAs have concentrated on particular activities and developed relations with certain partners.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Fuller & R. J. Bennett & M. Ramsden, 2002. "The Economic Development Role of English RDAs: The Need for Greater Discretionary Power," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 421-428.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:36:y:2002:i:4:p:421-428
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400220131188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400220131188
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400220131188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Darren Webb & Clive Collis, 2000. "Regional Development Agencies and the 'New Regionalism' in England," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9), pages 857-864.
    2. A Harding & S Wilks-Heeg & M Hutchins, 1999. "Regional Development Agencies and English Regionalisation: The Question of Accountability," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 17(6), pages 669-683, December.
    3. Peter W. Roberts Shaw & M. Greg Lloyd, 2000. "Regional Development Agencies in England: New Strategic Regional Planning Issues?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 75-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dave Valler & Juliet Carpenter, 2010. "New Labour's Spaces of Competitiveness," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 25(5-6), pages 438-456, August.
    2. Lee Pugalis & Ben Fisher, 2011. "English regions disbanded: European funding and economic regeneration implications," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 26(6-7), pages 500-516, September.
    3. Crispian Fuller & Robert J Bennett & Mark Ramsden, 2003. "Organised for Inward Investment? Development Agencies, Local Government, and Firms in the Inward Investment Process," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 35(11), pages 2025-2051, November.
    4. Graham Pearce & Sarah Ayres, 2009. "Governance in the English Regions: The Role of the Regional Development Agencies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(3), pages 537-557, March.
    5. David Bailey & Nigel Driffield, 2007. "Industrial Policy, FDI and Employment: Still ‘Missing a Strategy’," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 189-211, December.
    6. Eric McVittie & J. Kim Swales, 2007. "The Information Requirements for an Effective Regional Policy: A Critique of the Allsopp Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(3), pages 425-438, March.
    7. Kevin Cox & Alan Townsend, 2005. "Institutions and mediating inward investment in England and the USA," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 541-553.
    8. David Bailey & Stewart MacNeill, 2008. "The Rover Task Force: A case study in proactive and reactive policy intervention?," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 109-124, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darren Webb & Clive Collis, 2000. "Regional Development Agencies and the 'New Regionalism' in England," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9), pages 857-864.
    2. Leonie Janssen-Jansen & Melika Levelt, 2005. "Borderless Space - Ideas for Regional Collaboration," ERSA conference papers ersa05p292, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Steven Musson & Adam Tickell & Peter John, 2005. "A Decade of Decentralisation? Assessing the Role of the Government Offices for the English Regions," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(8), pages 1395-1412, August.
    4. Marielle Berriet-Solliec & Aurélie Trouvé, 2012. "Développement des territoires de projet : quels enjeux pour les politiques rurales ? / Territorial development projects: what issues for rural policies ?," INRA UMR CESAER Working Papers 2012/3, INRA UMR CESAER, Centre d'’Economie et Sociologie appliquées à l'’Agriculture et aux Espaces Ruraux.
    5. Graham Pearce & Sarah Ayres, 2009. "Governance in the English Regions: The Role of the Regional Development Agencies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(3), pages 537-557, March.
    6. Peter Roberts & Paul Benneworth, 2001. "Pathways to the Future? An Initial Assessment of RDA Strategies and their Contribution to Integrated Regional Development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 16(2), pages 142-159, May.
    7. Steven Musson & Adam Tickell & Peter John, 2002. "Building a World Class Region: Regional Strategy in the South East of England," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 17(3), pages 216-225, August.
    8. Giusy Cannone & Elisa Ughetto, 2014. "Funding Innovation at Regional Level: An Analysis of a Public Policy Intervention in the Piedmont Region," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 270-283, February.
    9. Abbas Ziafati Bafarasat & Mark Baker, 2016. "Building consensus for network power? Some reflections on strategic spatial planning in the North West region of England," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(5), pages 900-926, August.
    10. Janet Tully & Nigel Berkeley, 2004. "Visualising the Operating Behaviour of SMEs in Sector and Cluster: Evidence from the West Midlands," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 19(1), pages 38-54, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:36:y:2002:i:4:p:421-428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.