IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v34y2000i6p549-561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unequal Economic Development in China: Spatial Disparities and Regional Policy Reconsideration, 1985-1995

Author

Listed:
  • X. B. Zhao
  • S. P. Tong

Abstract

ZHAO X. B. and TONG S. P. (2000) Unequal economic development in China: spatial disparities and regional policy reconsideration, 1985-1995, Reg. Studies 34 , 549-561. Almost two decades into the implementation of Deng Xiaoping's 'get rich first' policy and 'coastal development strategy', income inequality and an imbalance in regional development have emerged as two of the most disturbing factors affecting contemporary China. This paper examines regional disparities in contemporary China and their changing trends and magnitude, based on a time series analysis of data sets for income and production across China for the last 10 years. This paper focuses on the examination of Gini-coefficients and coefficients of variation for two key economic indicators: GDP per capita and household income per capita at four levels of geographical aggregation - provincial, regional, urban and rural. Given that Chinese policy makers appear to have been strongly influenced by the two western theories of regional development (Williamson's inverted-U hypothesis and the centre-down paradigm), this paper includes a brief review of the two theories in a global context. The ndings of this research suggest that these two western regional development theories are rather ineffective and potentially detrimental when applied to China. It is time for Chinese policy makers to reconsider their existing prevailing 'get rich first' policy and 'coastal development strategy', and to focus more on the development of the inland regions. ZHAO X. B. et TONG S. P. (2000) Le developpement economique irregulier en Chine: ecarts geographiques et remise en question de la politique regionale, entre 1985 et 1995, Reg. Studies 34 , 549-561. Apres deux decennies presque de la mise en oeuvre des politiques de Deng Xiaoping. a savoir 'priorite a l'enrichissement' et 'pour un developpement cotier', l'ecart des revenus et le desequilibre regional se sont averes deux des facteurs les plus inquietants qui influent sur la Chine contemporaine. A partir d'une analyse d'une base de donnees en serie temporelle a propos du revenu et de la production dans toute la Chine des dix dernieres annees, cet article cherche a examiner les ecarts regionaux de la Chine contemporaine, leurs tendances et leur importance. Cet article porte sur l'etude des coefficients-gini et des coefficients de variation pour deux clignotants economiques cles: a savoir, le PIB par tete et le revenu menager par tete a quatre niveaux geographiques: provincial, regional, urbain et rural. Vu que les decideurs chinois ont ete influence fortement par deux theories occidentales d'amenagement du territoire (l'hypothese de l'U-inverse de Williamson et le paradigme dit centre-down selon lequel la richesse de quelques regions aura un effet positif sur d'autres), cet article fait une critique breve des deux theories dans une optique globale. Les preuves laissent supposer que ces deux theories occidentales d'amenagement du territoire, appliquees a la Chine, sont quelque peu inefficaces et potentiellement nuisibles. Le moment est arrive ou les decideurs chinois devraient remettre en question les politiques en vigueur, a savoir 'priorite a l'enrichissement' et 'pour un developpement cotier', et focaliser plus sur le developpement des regions interieures. ZHAO X. B. und TONG S. P. (2000) Ungleichmassige wirtschaftliche Entwicklung in China: raumliche Disparitaten und Revision regionalpolitischer Uberlegungen, Reg. Studies 34 , 549-561. Nach nahezu zwei Jahrzehntcn der Implementation von Deng Xiaopings Politik nach dem Motto 'erst einmal reich werden' und seiner 'Strategie der Kustenentwicklung' haben sich Ungleichheit der Einkommen und Unausgeglichenheit der regionalen Entwicklung als die beiden Faktoren herausgestellt, die China nun am meisten zu schaffen machen. Dieser Aufsatz untcrsucht mit Hilfe einer Zeitserienanalyse der Datenreihen fur Einkommen und Produktion in ganz China wa ¨hrend der letztcn zehn Jahre regionale Disparitaten im heutigen China, sowie ihr Ausmass und sich wandelnden Tendenzen. Der Aufsatz befasst sich vorallem mit der Prufung von Gini-Koeffizienten und Variationskoeffizienten fur zwei wirtschaftliche Hauptindikatoren: pro-Kopf Bruttoinlandsprodukt und pro-Kopf Haushaltseinkommen auf jeweils vier Ebenen gcographischer Gesamtbevolkerung: der provinziellen, regionalen, stadtischen und landlichen. Angesichts der Tatsache, dass chinesische Parteiideologen anscheinend stark von zwei Regionalentwicklungstheorien des Westens (Williamsons umgekehrter U-Hypothese und dem Centre-down Paradigma) beein usst sind, schliesst dieser Aufsatz auch eine kurze Besprechung der beiden Theorien im globalen Zusammenhang ein Die Befunde dieser Forschungsarbeit legen nahe, dass diese zwci Regionalcntwicklungstheoricn des Westens sich ziemlich unwirksam und moglicherweise nachteilig fur China erweisen. Fur chinesische Parteiideologen ist es an der Zeit, ihre gegenwartig vorherrschende, unter dem Motto 'erst einmal reich werden' stehende Politik und die 'Strategie der Kustenentwicklung' einer Uberholung zu unterziehen, und sich verstarkt der Entwicklung im Innern des Landes zuzuwenden.

Suggested Citation

  • X. B. Zhao & S. P. Tong, 2000. "Unequal Economic Development in China: Spatial Disparities and Regional Policy Reconsideration, 1985-1995," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 549-561.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:34:y:2000:i:6:p:549-561
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400050085666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400050085666
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400050085666?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cannon, T., 1990. "Regions, inequality and spatial policy in China," ISS Working Papers - General Series 18833, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    2. Carlino, Gerald A. & Mills, Leonard, 1996. "Testing neoclassical convergence in regional incomes and earnings," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 565-590, December.
    3. T. R. Lakshmanan & Chang-i Hua, 1987. "Regional Disparities in China," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 11(1), pages 97-104, April.
    4. C. Cindy Fan, 1997. "Uneven development and beyond: regional development theory in post‐Mao China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 620-639, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin, Wenwan & Zhu, Shengjun, 2023. "High-speed rail network and regional convergence/divergence in industrial structure," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    2. Simon X. B. Zhao & David W. H. Wong & David W. S. Wong & Y. P. Jiang, 2020. "Ever‐transient FDI and ever‐polarizing regional development: Revisiting conventional theories of regional development in the context of China, Southeast and South Asia," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 338-361, March.
    3. Mei Yang, 2015. "Regional Filmmaking After Jia Zhangke," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(3), pages 21582440156, August.
    4. Lu, Ding, 2002. "Rural-urban income disparity: impact of growth, allocative efficiency, and local growth welfare," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 419-429, December.
    5. Celine Bonnefond, 2014. "Growth Dynamics And Conditional Convergence Among Chinese Provinces: A Panel Data Investigation Using System Gmm Estimator," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 39(4), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Terry Sicular & Yue Ximing & Björn Gustafsson & Li Shi, 2007. "The Urban–Rural Income Gap And Inequality In China," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 53(1), pages 93-126, March.
    7. Carlos Gil Canaleta & Pedro Pascual Arzoz & Manuel Rapun Garate, 2004. "Regional Economic Disparities and Decentralisation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(1), pages 71-94, January.
    8. Hong-Yul Jeong & Jong-Hag Jang, 2015. "Effects of regional development policies on the resolution of income disparity in China," Journal of Economic and Financial Studies (JEFS), LAR Center Press, vol. 3(6), pages 45-57, December.
    9. Zan Yang & Shuping Wu & Yanhao Shen, 2017. "Monetary Policy, House Prices, and Consumption in China: A National and Regional Study," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 20(1), pages 23-49.
    10. Rong Sheng & Shi Lin Liu, 2018. "Evolution on regional disparities in China from 2000 to 2012: evidence from 74 cities within three mega-urban regions along Yangtze River," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 1989-2006, September.
    11. Thomas Gries & Manfred Kraft & Manuel Simon, 2016. "Explaining inter-provincial migration in China," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(4), pages 709-731, November.
    12. Qu, Shijin & Hu, Shougeng & Li, Weidong & Wang, Hui & Zhang, Chuanrong & Li, Quanfeng, 2020. "Interaction between urban land expansion and land use policy: An analysis using the DPSIR framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    13. Huaqun Li & Kingsley Haynes, 2012. "Foreign direct investment and China's regional inequality in the era of new regional development strategy," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(3), pages 279-300, August.
    14. Vusal Murselzade & Behiye Cavusoglu, 2021. "Relationship between the Service Sector and Economic Growth: Evidence from China," Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 8(1), pages 15-22.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark J Holmes & Jesús Otero & Theodore Panagiotidis, 2018. "Climbing the property ladder: An analysis of market integration in London property prices," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(12), pages 2660-2681, September.
    2. Fulong Wu, 2016. "China's Emergent City-Region Governance: A New Form of State Spatial Selectivity through State-orchestrated Rescaling," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1134-1151, November.
    3. K.P. Gluschenko (glu@nsu.ru ), 2010. "Income inequality in Russian regions: comparative analysis," Journal "Region: Economics and Sociology", Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of Siberian Branch of RAS, vol. 4.
    4. Kailei Wei & Shujie Yao & Aying Liu, 2007. "Foreign direct investment and regional inequality in China," Discussion Papers 07/32, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    5. Diao, Mi, 2018. "Does growth follow the rail? The potential impact of high-speed rail on the economic geography of China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 279-290.
    6. Shasha Lu & Xingliang Guan & Chao He & Jiali Zhang, 2014. "Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Policy Implications of Urban Land Expansion in Metropolitan Areas: A Case Study of Wuhan Urban Agglomeration, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-26, July.
    7. Giuseppe Arbia & Jean H. P. Paelinck, 2003. "Spatial Econometric Modeling of Regional Convergence in Continuous Time," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(3), pages 342-362, July.
    8. Partridge, Mark D. & Tsvetkova, Alexandra, 2018. "Local ability to "rewire" and socioeconomic performance: Evidence from US counties before and after the Great Recession," MPRA Paper 89313, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Cem Ertur & Julie Le Gallo & Catherine Baumont, 2006. "The European Regional Convergence Process, 1980-1995: Do Spatial Regimes and Spatial Dependence Matter?," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 29(1), pages 3-34, January.
    10. James E. Payne & James W. Saunoris & Saban Nazlioglu & Cagin Karul, 2023. "The convergence dynamics of economic freedom across U.S. states," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(4), pages 1216-1241, April.
    11. Bade, Franz-Josef & Niebuhr, Annekatrin & Schönert, Matthias, 2000. "Spatial structural change – Evidence and prospects," HWWA Discussion Papers 87, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    12. Changkyu Choi, 2009. "Does Bilateral Trade Lead To Income Convergence? Panel Evidence," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 34(1), pages 71-79, June.
    13. Fredriksson, Per G. & Millimet, Daniel L., 2002. "Strategic Interaction and the Determination of Environmental Policy across U.S. States," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 101-122, January.
    14. Michael Dunford & Boyang Gao & Weidong Liu, 2021. "Geography and the theory of uneven and combined development: Theorizing uniqueness and the return of China," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(5), pages 890-916, August.
    15. Trofimov, Ivan D., 2018. "Income terms of trade and economic convergence: Evidence from Latin America," MPRA Paper 87598, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Heckelman, Jac & Dinan, John, 2013. "Empirical Evidence Regarding Regional Political Convergence in the United States," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 43(2).
    17. Yun Li & Ming Xu & Juncheng Dai & Zhenshan Yang & Zhe Cheng, 2023. "Examining the Impact of Infrastructure Financialization on Uneven Regional Development: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-12, March.
    18. Jac C. Heckelman, 2013. "Income convergence among U.S. states: cross‐sectional and time series evidence," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(3), pages 1085-1109, August.
    19. Alan Gilbert, 1993. "Third World Cities: The Changing National Settlement System," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(4-5), pages 721-740, May.
    20. John Ashworth & Bruno Heyndels, 2001. "Political Fragmentation and the Evolution of National Tax Structures in the OECD," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 8(4), pages 377-393, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:34:y:2000:i:6:p:549-561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.