IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v33y1999i7p669-680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Boundaries as Social Practice and Discourse: The Finnish-Russian Border

Author

Listed:
  • Anssi Paasi

Abstract

PAASI A. (1999) Boundaries as social practice and discourse: the Finnish-Russian border, Reg. Studies 33 , 669-680. Boundaries are a key concept in political geography, where they are typically understood as empirical manifestations of state power and territoriality. This paper suggests a multidimensional approach to the analysis of boundaries in a world of de-territorialization and re-territorialization. Boundaries are understood as institutions and symbols that are produced and reproduced in social practices and discourses. The meanings of the Finnish-Russian border are discussed at the scale of both the Finnish state and a locality that was divided by the new border after World War Two. The roles of this border have been highly varied, reflecting not only Finnish-Russian relations but also changes in global geopolitics. Current economic practices and discourses strive to open up borders and permit freer movement of capital and people, but in terms of Finnish foreign policy, security discourses and territorial control, this border is still a relatively closed one. PAASI A. (1999) Les frontieres en tant que facteur d'habitude et de discours sociaux: la frontiere entre la Finlande et la Russie, Reg. Studies 33 , 669-680. Les frontieres sont des concepts cles de la geographie politique, etant considerees comme des preuves empiriques du pouvoir d'Etat et du territoire. Cet article avance une facon multidimensionnelle d'aborder l'analyse de la notion de frontieres dans un monde de demantelement et de reconstruction de frontieres. Les frontieres sont considerees des institutions et des symboles qui se produisent et se reproduisent a partir des habitudes et des discours sociaux. Les significations de la frontiere entre la Finlande et la Russie se voient discuter a l'echelle de l'Etat finlandais et du point de vue d'une region divisee par la nouvelle frontiere suite a la deuxieme guerre mondiale. Les roles de cette frontiere ont varie sensiblement, ce qui reflete non seulement les rapports entre les Finlandais et les Russes, mais aussi l'evolution de la geopolitique sur le plan mondial. Les habitudes et les discours economiques en vigueur cherchent a ouvrir des frontieres et a faciliter la libre circulation du capital et des personnes. Toujours est-il que, vu la politique etrangere du gouvernement finlandais, etant donne les discours concernant la securite et quant au controle des territoires, cette frontiere reste relativement fermee. PAASI A. (1999) Grenzen als gesellschaftliche Praxis und Diskurs: die finnisch-russische Grenze, Reg. Studies 33 , 669-680. Grenzen sind ein Grundbegriff der politischen Geografie, in der sie typisch als empirische Bekundung der Staatsgewalt und dem Raumbedurfnis der Bewohner aufgefasst werden. In einer Welt der Gebietsauflosung und erneuten Gebietsbildung regt dieser Aufsatz ein multidimensionales Angehen der Analyse von Grenzen an. Grenzen werden als Institutionen und als Symbole verstanden, die in der gesellschaftlichen Praxis und Diskursen gezogen und nachvollzogen werden. Die Bedeutungen der finnischrussischen Grenze werden sowohl auf der Ebene des finnischen Staates wie der eines Ortes diskutiert, der nach dem 2. Weltkrieg durch eine neu festelegte Grenze geteilt wurde. Die Rollen dieser Grenze sind sehr verschieden gewesen, und spiegeln nicht nur finnisch-russische Beziehungen wider, sondern auch Wandel in der globalen Geopolitik. Gegenwartige wirtschaftliche Praxis und Meinungen gehen dahin, Grenzen zuoffnen und den Austausch von Menschen und Kapital zu erleichtern, aber fur die finnische Aussenpolitik, Sicherheitsbesprechungen und Gebietskontrolle bleibt die Grenze nach wie vor verhaltnismassig geschlossen.

Suggested Citation

  • Anssi Paasi, 1999. "Boundaries as Social Practice and Discourse: The Finnish-Russian Border," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 669-680.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:33:y:1999:i:7:p:669-680
    DOI: 10.1080/00343409950078701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343409950078701
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343409950078701?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A Paasi, 1991. "Deconstructing Regions: Notes on the Scales of Spatial Life," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 23(2), pages 239-256, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Nijkamp, 2021. "Borders as opportunities in the space-economy: towards a theory of enabling space," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 223-239, February.
    2. Dimitris Kallioras & George Petrakos & Maria Tsiapa & Lefteris Topaloglou, 2011. "The Determinants of Growth in EU Border Regions," ERSA conference papers ersa10p702, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Leandro Francisco José, 2019. "The Mesmerizing Journey from Gyeongju to Lisbon: The BRI as a Mechanism of De-bordering, Re-bordering, and Co-bordering," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 123-152, September.
    4. SOHN Christophe & LICHERON Julien, 2015. "From barrier to resource? Modelling the border effects on metropolitan functions in Europe," LISER Working Paper Series 2015-08, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    5. Vinayaraj V.K., 2011. "Finland’s Self-Defence Strategies," International Studies, , vol. 48(3-4), pages 257-280, July.
    6. Anna A. Dekalchuk, 2014. "Schengen Borders In Practice: Facts About Finland (And Russia)," HSE Working papers WP BRP 05/IR/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    7. James Anderson & Liam O'Dowd, 1999. "Borders, Border Regions and Territoriality: Contradictory Meanings, Changing Significance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 593-604.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feyza Eldeniz, 2011. "An Assessment Of Institutional Restructuring In Regional Policy," ERSA conference papers ersa11p70, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Bouke van Gorp & Kees Terlouw, 2017. "Making News: Newspapers and the Institutionalisation of New Regions," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(6), pages 718-736, December.
    3. Toni Ahlqvist, 2014. "Building Innovation Excellence of World Class: The Cluster as an Instrument of Spatial Governance in the European Union," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1712-1731, September.
    4. John Tomaney & Neil Ward, 2000. "England and the 'New Regionalism'," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 471-478.
    5. Sedlacek Sabine & Kurka Bernhard & Maier Gunther, 2009. "Regional identity: a key to overcome structural weaknesses in peripheral rural regions?," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 1(4), pages 180-201, January.
    6. Kaj Zimmerbauer & Sulevi Riukulehto & Timo Suutari, 2017. "Killing the Regional Leviathan? Deinstitutionalization and Stickiness of Regions," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 676-693, July.
    7. Garri Raagmaa, 2001. "Regional identity and social capital in regional economic development and planning," ERSA conference papers ersa01p194, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Bernhard Kurka & Gunther Maier & Sabine Sedlacek, 2007. "Breaking the vicious cycle in peripheral rural regions: the case of "Waldviertler Wohlviertel" in Austria," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2007_03, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    9. Andrea Lucarelli, 2018. "Co-branding public place brands: towards an alternative approach to place branding," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(4), pages 260-271, November.
    10. Danny MacKinnon & Andrew Cumbers & Andy Pike & Kean Birch & Robert McMaster, 2009. "Evolution in Economic Geography: Institutions, Political Economy, and Adaptation," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 85(2), pages 129-150, April.
    11. Pallagst, Karina M. & Dörrenbächer, H. Peter & Weith, Thomas, 2018. "Grenzüberschreitende Kooperation theoretisch: Erklärungsansätze aus europäischer Integration, Regionalismus und Governance," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Pallagst, Karina M. & Hartz, Andrea & Caesar, Beate (ed.), Border Futures - Zukunft Grenze - Avenir Frontière: Zukunftsfähigkeit grenzüberschreitender Zusammenarbeit, volume 20, pages 28-40, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    12. Tauri Tuvikene, 2016. "Strategies for Comparative Urbanism: Post-socialism as a De-territorialized Concept," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 132-146, January.
    13. Luciane Aguiar Borges, 2017. "Using the Past to Construct Territorial Identities in Regional Planning: The Case of Mälardalen, Sweden," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 659-675, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:33:y:1999:i:7:p:669-680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.