IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recsxx/v27y2024i1p2404795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trading in the Quantum Era: optimizing Bitcoin gains and energy costs

Author

Listed:
  • Simona-Vasilica Oprea
  • Adela Bâra
  • Cristian Bucur
  • Bogdan-George Tudorică
  • Niculae Oprea

Abstract

This paper presents an in-depth analysis of a Quantum-inspired Multi-objective Optimization Algorithm (QMOA) applied to a unique problem: maximizing trading profits while minimizing energy costs. Previous investigations have explored the profitability of Bitcoin, yet our research delves into its relationship with energy costs. Regarding the trade-offs, the Pareto analysis reveals that trading profit and energy cost do not strongly inversely correlate. The range of outcomes shows a relatively uniform trading profit (from 1.302,85 to 1.310,22$), but a broader variation in energy costs (from 1.141,66 to 5.657,94$). While the trading profit remains stable, there is a wide array of options for minimizing energy cost, which is influenced by various constraints and market conditions. Solutions tend to cluster more in areas of higher energy costs. However, the variability in energy costs offers Bitcoin miners choices, allowing them to tailor strategies, whether that involves prioritizing energy efficiency, profit maximization or striking a balance.

Suggested Citation

  • Simona-Vasilica Oprea & Adela Bâra & Cristian Bucur & Bogdan-George Tudorică & Niculae Oprea, 2024. "Trading in the Quantum Era: optimizing Bitcoin gains and energy costs," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 2404795-240, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:2404795
    DOI: 10.1080/15140326.2024.2404795
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15140326.2024.2404795
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15140326.2024.2404795?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:2404795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.