IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recsxx/v27y2024i1p2395775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An improved model accuracy for forecasting risk measures: application of ensemble methods

Author

Listed:
  • Katleho Makatjane
  • Kesaobaka Mmelesi

Abstract

Statistical-based predictions with extreme value theory improve the performance of the risk model not by choosing the model structure that is expected to predict the best but by developing a model whose results are a combination of models with different shapes. Using different ensemble algorithms to conglomerate the TBATS and the GEV distribution, we found that the stacking ensemble algorithm outperforms other ensembles hence the forecasting accuracy of risk measures is improved with the stacking ensemble algorithm. The risk estimates suggest that the returns on losses averaging 0.014 and 0.018 invested at 90 and 99 percent respectively, are riskier than the returns on gains. Backtesting results further revealed that all the risk measures are reliable, and the combined model is a good one for computing financial risk particularly in South Africa. At high confidence levels, all the risk measures seem to perform better than at lower confidence levels, as evidenced by higher probability values from backtesting using the Kupiec and Christoffersen test at 95 percent than at 99 percent levels of significance.

Suggested Citation

  • Katleho Makatjane & Kesaobaka Mmelesi, 2024. "An improved model accuracy for forecasting risk measures: application of ensemble methods," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 2395775-239, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:2395775
    DOI: 10.1080/15140326.2024.2395775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15140326.2024.2395775
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15140326.2024.2395775?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:2395775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.