IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recsxx/v27y2024i1p2354641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Annual report tone and divergence of opinion: evidence from textual analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zhihao Qin
  • Menglin Cui

Abstract

By utilizing web-crawling and text analysis techniques on unstructured big data (text sets), this study examines to what extent investors disagree with the sentiment conveyed in annual reports. The main empirical findings suggest that the tone of annual reports significantly influences investor opinions. Specifically, a negative tone in annual reports is associated with high levels of divergence among investors’ opinions, whereas a positive tone correlates with lower divergence. In the robustness tests, the results remain consistent after controlling for various factors. After we control for Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A), both positive and negative tones in annual reports continue to be significant predictors of divergences in investor opinions. Additionally, after controlling for future earnings quality, future cash flows, and future earnings surprises, investors still present high/low divergence of opinion in response to a negative/positive tone in annual reports. Moreover, the robustness of our analysis is assessed by employing alternative sentiment analysis word lists.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhihao Qin & Menglin Cui, 2024. "Annual report tone and divergence of opinion: evidence from textual analysis," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 2354641-235, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:2354641
    DOI: 10.1080/15140326.2024.2354641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15140326.2024.2354641
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15140326.2024.2354641?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:2354641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.