Author
Listed:
- Ziheng Song
- Shafiq Ur Rehman
- Chun PingNg
- Yuan Zhou
- Patick Washington
- Ricardo Verschueren
Abstract
The potential of FinTech algorithms to decrease gender bias in credit decisions is limited by the impartiality of the data used to train them. If the data is partial or biased, the algorithmic decision-making process may also be discriminatory, exacerbating existing inequalities. In this study, the effect of FinTech Firms on reducing gender inequality in bank loans in the USA is examined using a loan application from 60 U.S. banks from 2012 to 2022. We use a two-step system GMM approach to estimate the effect of FinTech algorithms on gender bias in credit decisions, focusing on female loan approval rates. Our results show that by controlling the other factor, banks with credit algorithms significantly increased the loan approval rates and thus reduced gender inequality in bank loans. Specifically, the female loan approval rates increased by 8% after banks adopted FinTech algorithms. We also find that the effect is more substantial for banks with higher baseline gender bias in credit decisions. We also performed the Difference in Difference analysis to analyse the policy shocks and FinTech adoption on bank loans’ gender inequality. Results of the study show that FinTech adoption and policy implications have significantly increased the loans for female borrowers. Our findings suggest that FinTech algorithms can potentially mitigate gender bias in credit decisions and promote gender equality in financial services.
Suggested Citation
Ziheng Song & Shafiq Ur Rehman & Chun PingNg & Yuan Zhou & Patick Washington & Ricardo Verschueren, 2024.
"Do FinTech algorithms reduce gender inequality in banks loans? A quantitative study from the USA,"
Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 2324247-232, December.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:2324247
DOI: 10.1080/15140326.2024.2324247
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:2324247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recs .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.