IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recsxx/v13y2010i2p305-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Wins in South-South Trade Agreements? New Evidence for Mercosur

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro E. Moncarz
  • Marcel Vaillant

Abstract

Using a detailed database on intra-MERCOSUR tariffs, we estimate the effect of tariff preferences on the origin of imports of MERCOSUR members. The results show tariff preferences affected imports patterns in the cases of Argentina and Uruguay, and to a less extent also those of Brazil. For the first two countries the results support the hypothesis that MERCOSUR has produced a diversion of trade, no similar evidence is found for Brazil and Paraguay.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro E. Moncarz & Marcel Vaillant, 2010. "Who Wins in South-South Trade Agreements? New Evidence for Mercosur," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 305-334, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:13:y:2010:i:2:p:305-334
    DOI: 10.1016/S1514-0326(10)60014-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/S1514-0326(10)60014-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S1514-0326(10)60014-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adriana Peluffo, 2011. "Integración regional y difusión de tecnologí­a: el caso uruguayo," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 11-10, Instituto de Economía - IECON.
    2. Lalanne, Alvaro & Sánchez, Guillermo, 2020. "Evaluación del impacto de acuerdos comerciales: metodologías, experiencias internacionales y aplicaciones para el caso uruguayo," Estudios y Perspectivas – Oficina de la CEPAL en Montevideo 45070, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    3. Alberto Portugal & Jose-Daniel Reyes & Gonzalo Varela, 2015. "Uruguay," World Bank Publications - Reports 23349, The World Bank Group.
    4. Luis Marcelo Florensa & Pedro Esteban Moncarz, 2020. "Trade integration strategies and welfare. A comparative study of six selected Latin-American countries," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4377, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    5. Ragoobur, Verena Tandrayen & Tengur, Neha Devi & Seewooruttun, Bhooteshta, 2021. "South-South Trade: The Potential for Mauritius," Journal of Economic Development, The Economic Research Institute, Chung-Ang University, vol. 46(3), pages 45-65, September.
    6. Yoon Heo & Nguyen Khanh Doanh, 2020. "Is NAFTA Trade‐Creating or Trade‐Diverting? A System GMM Approach," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 39(3), pages 222-238, September.
    7. Frederik Stender, 2018. "MERCOSUR in gravity: an accounting approach to analyzing its trade effects," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 501-522, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F12 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies; Fragmentation
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:13:y:2010:i:2:p:305-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.