Author
Abstract
The usage of medical technologies alongside the medicalization of death brought about the medical norm of fighting for life with all means available. Yet, this norm was questioned and the demand for patient autonomy gained importance. It is in this context that the right to die movement emerged in 1976, and living wills were introduced in Japan. The right to die movement promotes legislation of “death with dignity” arguing for patient empowerment, whereas their opponents warn against social exclusion of severely ill, old, and disabled people. Against this discursive background, I draw on qualitative interviews with Japanese who signed a living will and examine what motivated them to engage in advance decision-making. In recourse to the Foucauldian notions of biopower and biopolitics, I show that the living will is a technology of the entrepreneurial self, to govern itself. My research participants expressed their critical awareness for a variety of problems they aim to solve by their living will, e.g. paternalism and overtreatment, conflicting values and attitudes toward life-sustaining treatments between family members, as well as shortcomings in the social security and care sector. Hence, through the living will the risks of life are shifted to the self-responsibility of the individual, who opts for death to avoid becoming a burden on others and society. Accordingly, the living will can be seen as a means of the neo-liberal state to increasingly withdraw from its social responsibility of granting the right to comprehensive health care, a secure old age, and adequate care.
Suggested Citation
Celia Spoden, 2020.
"Deciding one’s own death in advance: Biopower, living wills, and resistance to a legislation of death with dignity in Japan,"
Contemporary Japan, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 63-82, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:32:y:2020:i:1:p:63-82
DOI: 10.1080/18692729.2020.1714279
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:32:y:2020:i:1:p:63-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcoj .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.