IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcojxx/v18y2007i1p85-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Female-dominated Path and Attainment of Marital Status for Japanese Women

Author

Listed:
  • Mayumi Nakamura

Abstract

Why do many Japanese women choose female-dominated occupations, even though it is generally believed that they lead to dead-end careers? In this article, I posit that under the conditions of existing discrimination by employers and structural barriers, many Japanese women are investing in this “feminine path” (non-career clerical or assistant roles in large companies) which endows women (or so they believe) with certain advantages in acquiring status through marriage (“attainment of marital status”). I call this “feminine capital”, and it is one reason why women choose these paths.1 I argue that these feminine paths can benefit them in attaining marital status more than gender-neutral occupations, especially when women are not capable of pursuing highly selective gender-neutral occupations.2 Feminine occupations are considered to have benefits when compared to gender-neutral occupations, mainly because they have advantages in cultural capital and social capital.

Suggested Citation

  • Mayumi Nakamura, 2007. "The Female-dominated Path and Attainment of Marital Status for Japanese Women," Contemporary Japan, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 85-110, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:18:y:2007:i:1:p:85-110
    DOI: 10.1080/09386491.2007.11826939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09386491.2007.11826939
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09386491.2007.11826939?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:18:y:2007:i:1:p:85-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcoj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.