IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcojxx/v17y2006i1p57-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Imperialism in a Nutshell: Conflict and the “Concert of Powers” in the Tripartite Intervention, 1895

Author

Listed:
  • Urs Matthias Zachmann

Abstract

Shortly after the end of the Sino-Japanese War in 1895, Russia, France, and Germany forced Japan to return the Liaodong peninsula to China (the so-called Tripartite intervention). The event had an immense impact on Japanese public opinion and considerable consequences for Japan's future course in international politics. However, the question still remains why Japanese decision-makers of the time did not foresee such an intervention, or if they did, why they thought they could resist. The present study tries to answer the question by reconstructing the knowledge upon which the Japanese leaders acted, and so understand their decisions as the rational application of rules that prevailed in those times of late high imperialism. The study argues that the Tripartite intervention was a constellation of conflict and consensual action typical to international power politics. Judging by what the Japanese leaders knew or could know of the constellation, their calculations might have been correct. However, a series of events that would have been hard to predict even for Western observers—especially the accession of Germany to the Russian plans for intervention—proved fatal to Japan's hopes of overcoming a possible intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Urs Matthias Zachmann, 2006. "Imperialism in a Nutshell: Conflict and the “Concert of Powers” in the Tripartite Intervention, 1895," Contemporary Japan, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 57-82, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:17:y:2006:i:1:p:57-82
    DOI: 10.1080/09386491.2006.11826924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09386491.2006.11826924
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09386491.2006.11826924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:17:y:2006:i:1:p:57-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcoj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.