IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcojxx/v16y2005i1p145-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“We are all ‘Residents of Japan’”: The Construction of Common Identity and the Success of the Anti-fingerprinting Movement

Author

Listed:
  • Akemi Nakamura

Abstract

The anti-fingerprinting movement in the 1980s was the first movement of zainichi Koreans in Japan that achieved both its goal and support from Japanese. Considering the movement as a result of the acceptance by Japanese of Koreans' claim of their being the same “residents of Japan” as Japanese are, this paper analyzes how this acceptance was achieved, based on interview data. Particular focus is given to interpretations of structural factors by four movement actors: the Japanese state, Koreans, Korean ethnic organizations, and Japanese. This paper discusses how the Koreans' separation from ethnic organizations and the Japanese' questioning of undemocratic behavior of their own state removed the “cage of nationalism” that had divided the two. It concludes that it was this separation from the state that made the anti-fingerprinting movement one of “residents of Japan,” which was characterized by a collaboration between two groups whose national and ethnic boundaries were blurred. By describing the anti-fingerprinting movement as a “failure” from the “new” social movement point of view while being a “success” as an “old” social movement, this paper also suggests the limitation of distinction between the “old” and the “new” based on different roles of identity.

Suggested Citation

  • Akemi Nakamura, 2005. "“We are all ‘Residents of Japan’”: The Construction of Common Identity and the Success of the Anti-fingerprinting Movement," Contemporary Japan, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 145-165, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:145-165
    DOI: 10.1080/09386491.2005.11826915
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09386491.2005.11826915
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09386491.2005.11826915?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:16:y:2005:i:1:p:145-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcoj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.