IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcojxx/v14y2003i1p69-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Modern Japan: Are There More Comparisons to Make?

Author

Listed:
  • Raymond Grew

Abstract

Comparison with other societies is such an ingrained part of the study of Japan that there is reason to ask whether in the future that habit will die out, continue as before, or take new directions. This essay suggests reasons for expecting new uses of comparison. Scholars interested in such current issues as globalization, state making, the social position of women and minorities, and mass culture will be stimulated to look to Japan's record of adaptation and Japan's regional and international influence, making comparisons that start with the Japanese example. Contemporary theoretical work in the social sciences will lead to new comparative questions, focusing on carefully formulated problems. Topics flourishing in work on other societies, including Foucauldian issues of power, gender studies, colonial encounters, and the uses of memory will lead to new investigations of Japanese society and history. At the same time, the familiar topics of comparison in Japanese studies, such as elite formation, religion, and institutions, are likely to take on new life. As an example of some of these possibilities, the essay concludes by comparing the modern histories of Japan and Italy.

Suggested Citation

  • Raymond Grew, 2003. "Comparing Modern Japan: Are There More Comparisons to Make?," Contemporary Japan, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 69-102, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:69-102
    DOI: 10.1080/09386491.2003.11826890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09386491.2003.11826890
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09386491.2003.11826890?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:69-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcoj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.