IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcjaxx/v7y2019i2p184-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stock price crash risk and auditor-client contracting

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Chu
  • Junxiong Fang
  • Jeong-Bon Kim
  • Yi Zhou

Abstract

Using a large sample of Chinese-listed firms for the period of 2001–2014, we find that the auditors of clients with higher crash risk tend to charge higher fees, are more likely to issue modified audit opinions, and have a higher turnover tendency, which is consistent with the notion that a client’s exposure to higher crash risk imposes greater engagement risk on its auditor. Consistent with crash risk increasing auditor engagement risk, we find that crash risk is associated with a client’s poor accounting quality and high frequency of restatements, although auditors exert higher efforts when observing clients’ high crash risk. Taken altogether, our results suggest that a client’s crash risk serves as an informative signal for engagement risk, and that this factor plays a crucial role in shaping auditor-client contracting relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Chu & Junxiong Fang & Jeong-Bon Kim & Yi Zhou, 2019. "Stock price crash risk and auditor-client contracting," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 184-213, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:184-213
    DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2019.1661169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2019.1661169
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21697213.2019.1661169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guilherme Belloque & Martina K Linnenluecke & Mauricio Marrone & Abhay K Singh & Rui Xue, 2021. "55 years of Abacus: Evolution of Research Streams and Future Research Directions," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(3), pages 593-618, September.
    2. Hongmin Jin & Lu Wang & Zuoping Xiao & Hung‐Gay Fung, 2023. "What firm risk factors drive bank loan pricing and other terms? Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 2985-3010, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:184-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcja .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.