IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcjaxx/v5y2017i4p527-546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do risk disclosures in annual reports improve analyst forecast accuracy?

Author

Listed:
  • Xiongyuan Wang
  • Yanqiong Li
  • Min Xiao

Abstract

Risk information disclosed in annual reports may have positive impacts on analyst earnings forecast by improving information quality, or may have negative impacts by increasing the risk perception of analysts. In this paper, we quantify risk information disclosures in annual reports using textual analysis, and examine the impact on analyst forecast accuracy. The results at firm-level show that (1) collectively analyst forecast accuracy increases with more risk disclosures; (2) this effect is more significant in the group of non-SOEs, higher auditing quality, higher earnings quality, or better corporate governance, suggesting that good internal and external governance mechanisms provide a guarantee for the information function of risk disclosures and for analyst forecast accuracy; (3) the conclusion are robust to firm inherent risks, and they are favourable for increasing forecast accuracy when disclosing risks higher than the inherent risks. The results at analyst individual-level show that (1) individually, analyst forecast accuracy increases with more risk disclosures; (2) this effect is more significant in the group of non-star, less industrial expertise and less follow experience. It suggests that the weak heterogeneity of risk disclosures in annual reports is favourable to increase analyst forecast accuracy in China. The conclusions support the information argument, and contribute to the emerging risk disclosure literature and the literature on analyst forecasts.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiongyuan Wang & Yanqiong Li & Min Xiao, 2017. "Do risk disclosures in annual reports improve analyst forecast accuracy?," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 527-546, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:5:y:2017:i:4:p:527-546
    DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2017.1438288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2017.1438288
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21697213.2017.1438288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:5:y:2017:i:4:p:527-546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcja .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.