IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcjaxx/v11y2023i4p695-718.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting for goodwill in China: a case study of two-step acquisitions

Author

Listed:
  • Ceng Zeng
  • Weiguo Zhang
  • Luo Zuo

Abstract

We use a case study to illustrate how different acquisition methods can result in different amounts of goodwill recognised on financial statements in China. China Merchants Bank adopted a two-step acquisition method: first, it acquired 53% of the shares of Hong Kong’s Wing Lung Bank to gain corporate control in 2008; second, it acquired the remaining 47% of shares in 2009. Using this method, China Merchants Bank recognised the acquisition premium as goodwill only in the first step and recognised the acquisition premium in the second step as a decrease in additional paid-in capital. This two-step acquisition method significantly reduces the amount of goodwill shown on financial statements and lowers the likelihood and amount of subsequent goodwill impairment. Different acquisition methods can lead to different amounts of goodwill initially recognised when accounting standards permit the partial goodwill method and regard the transactions between the parent and non-controlling shareholders as equity transactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ceng Zeng & Weiguo Zhang & Luo Zuo, 2023. "Accounting for goodwill in China: a case study of two-step acquisitions," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 695-718, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:695-718
    DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2023.2300289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2023.2300289
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21697213.2023.2300289?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:11:y:2023:i:4:p:695-718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcja .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.