IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v28y2025i7p1155-1171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring online deviant behaviour: a study on the impact of internet anonymity on tourists’ exaggerated comments

Author

Listed:
  • Xinhua Guan
  • Jinhong Gong
  • Yingchen Zheng
  • Tzung-Cheng Huan

Abstract

The research objectives of this paper are to analyze the role of internet anonymity in customers’ publication of exaggerated online reviews, explore the potential processes of moral disengagement, and study possible moderating and mediating factors. To achieve these objectives, this study conducts a questionnaire survey among 530 internet users and perform regression analysis to test the research model. This test results reveal that internet anonymity has a positive impact on exaggerated online reviews through two moral disengagement mechanisms: advantageous comparison and distorting consequences. Moral identity not only negatively moderates the effect of internet anonymity on advantageous comparison and distorting consequences but also negatively moderates the mediating role of advantageous comparison and distorting consequences between internet anonymity and exaggerated online reviews. This research enriches the findings in the field of fake reviews and value co-destruction in the tourism sector and offers insights for relevant regulatory agencies to improve the online environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinhua Guan & Jinhong Gong & Yingchen Zheng & Tzung-Cheng Huan, 2025. "Exploring online deviant behaviour: a study on the impact of internet anonymity on tourists’ exaggerated comments," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(7), pages 1155-1171, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:28:y:2025:i:7:p:1155-1171
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2024.2353329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2024.2353329
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2024.2353329?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:28:y:2025:i:7:p:1155-1171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.