IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v28y2025i4p666-679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the effects of augmented reality on sport event experiences and revisit intention: a comparative analysis between AR and non-AR users

Author

Listed:
  • Henrique Fátima Boyol Ngan
  • Weng Si (Clara) Lei

Abstract

The emergence of immersive technology, such as Augmented Reality (AR), in tourism events has grown exponentially in recent years. Yet, its effectiveness remains largely unknown as limited research is available to reveal a comprehensive comparison between AR usage and non-usage. To that end, the present study aims to explore the effects of AR on tourism event experience and attendees’ revisit intention through a comparative analysis between users and non-users of AR. Data were collected from 204 participants who used AR at the Beijing Winter Olympics and 248 participants who attended the event but did not use AR. The results showed that all core dimensions of event experience significantly influenced revisit intention except novelty. Cognitive engagement was significantly higher in the AR group and exerted greater influence on revisit intention. These results add to the existing body of knowledge in AR and provide managerial insights to enhance the immersive and engaging aspects of the event.

Suggested Citation

  • Henrique Fátima Boyol Ngan & Weng Si (Clara) Lei, 2025. "Examining the effects of augmented reality on sport event experiences and revisit intention: a comparative analysis between AR and non-AR users," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 666-679, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:28:y:2025:i:4:p:666-679
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2024.2345173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2024.2345173
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2024.2345173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:28:y:2025:i:4:p:666-679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.