IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v27y2024i22p3754-3769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating machine learning techniques for predicting tourist occupancy: an experiment with pre- and post-pandemic COVID-19 data

Author

Listed:
  • L. Moreno-Izquierdo
  • A. Más-Ferrando
  • J. F. Perles-Ribes
  • A. Rubia-Serrano
  • T. Torregrosa-Martí

Abstract

This paper analyses the prediction capacity of machine learning techniques under severe demand shocks. Specifically, three methods – Naive Bayes, Random Forest and Support Vector Machine – are tested in predicting rental occupancy for tourist accommodation in the city of Madrid. We compare two different scenarios: firstly, the predictive capacity in the years prior to COVID-19 and, secondly, the ability to anticipate demand behaviour once the pandemic started. The results demonstrate first that without market disturbances, the Random Forest model exhibits the best predictive capability. Second, the COVID-19 pandemic caused such major changes that none of the three tested models are entirely reliable, although the Random Forest and Naive Bayes models outperform the SVM model. As a methodological novelty, this paper includes occupancy quantiles to resolve problems with available data and temporal biases.

Suggested Citation

  • L. Moreno-Izquierdo & A. Más-Ferrando & J. F. Perles-Ribes & A. Rubia-Serrano & T. Torregrosa-Martí, 2024. "Evaluating machine learning techniques for predicting tourist occupancy: an experiment with pre- and post-pandemic COVID-19 data," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(22), pages 3754-3769, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:27:y:2024:i:22:p:3754-3769
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2023.2282163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2023.2282163
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2023.2282163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:27:y:2024:i:22:p:3754-3769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.