IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v27y2024i17p2815-2832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The countryside in the eyes of the beholder: developing and testing a tourists’ rurality perception scale

Author

Listed:
  • Kai Meng
  • Mingjie Wang
  • Haowen Yuan
  • Bingyi Zhang

Abstract

Although rurality is considered the core attraction of rural tourism, few studies have explored how to define and measure it using the tourist perspective. To address this gap, this study identified the different dimensions of the tourists’ rurality perception by qualitatively analyzing tourists’ online reviews and interview texts. These dimensions reflect both objective elements of rurality and the subjective feelings of tourists. This study argues that rurality should be defined in the tourism context as a combination of objective elements (e.g. landscape, built, and natural features) influencing tourists’ subjective perceptions (e.g. peaceful, engaging). Therefore, this study identified and categorized the different dimensions of the tourists’ rurality perceptions, developed these categories and dimensions into a tourists’ rurality perception scale with 25 items representing five dimensions (i.e. relaxation, authenticity, novelty, escapism, and modernity), and tested the scale’s reliability and validity. This novel measurement scale provides theoretical support and practical guidance for rural tourism research and development.

Suggested Citation

  • Kai Meng & Mingjie Wang & Haowen Yuan & Bingyi Zhang, 2024. "The countryside in the eyes of the beholder: developing and testing a tourists’ rurality perception scale," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(17), pages 2815-2832, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:27:y:2024:i:17:p:2815-2832
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2023.2240476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2023.2240476
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2023.2240476?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:27:y:2024:i:17:p:2815-2832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.